Comments on: Groovy Builders http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/groovy-builders/ informs on and evangelizes best practices of using <a href="http://refactr.com/the-agile-manifesto/">agile methods</a> when designing and developing what are currently being called “Web 2.0” products and applications. Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:02:29 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Mike Henderson http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/groovy-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-14561 Mike Henderson Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:15:30 +0000 http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/10/groovy-builders/#comment-14561 Hi, I tried something similar a while back: http://www.behindthesite.com/blog/C663408438/E876434710/index.html I never got to use it for real and I'm not sure if the builder API has changed. Cheers, Mike Hi,

I tried something similar a while back: http://www.behindthesite.com/blog/C663408438/E876434710/index.html

I never got to use it for real and I’m not sure if the builder API has changed.

Cheers,

Mike

]]> By: refactr Blog Archive » Refactr Contributions to Grails and Groovy http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/groovy-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-10235 refactr Blog Archive » Refactr Contributions to Grails and Groovy Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:13:40 +0000 http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/10/groovy-builders/#comment-10235 [...] still been working with Groovy Builders in my free time lately. With quite a bit of help from Andres Almiray to refactor my [...] [...] still been working with Groovy Builders in my free time lately. With quite a bit of help from Andres Almiray to refactor my [...]

]]> By: Scott Vlaminck http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/groovy-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-7492 Scott Vlaminck Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:16:26 +0000 http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/10/groovy-builders/#comment-7492 I have definitely thought about contributing the code to the Groovy project. The ObjectGraphBuilder I have is currently pretty naive, so I was planning to put more time into it first. But I guess I should probably just contribute it and worry about improving it later. That way it would be of more use to others sooner. I have definitely thought about contributing the code to the Groovy project. The ObjectGraphBuilder I have is currently pretty naive, so I was planning to put more time into it first. But I guess I should probably just contribute it and worry about improving it later. That way it would be of more use to others sooner.

]]> By: Andres Almiray http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/groovy-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-7416 Andres Almiray Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:52:52 +0000 http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/10/groovy-builders/#comment-7416 ObjectGraphBuilder is a great idea, have you considered the possibility of donating it to the Groovy project? =) ObjectGraphBuilder is a great idea, have you considered the possibility of donating it to the Groovy project? =)

]]> By: Enfranchised Mind » links for 2007-10-11 http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/groovy-builders/comment-page-1/#comment-7212 Enfranchised Mind » links for 2007-10-11 Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:45:51 +0000 http://refactr.com/blog/2007/10/10/groovy-builders/#comment-7212 [...] refactr Blog Archive » Groovy Builders Nice description of builders from the Refactr people. (tags: groovy programming) [...] [...] refactr Blog Archive » Groovy Builders Nice description of builders from the Refactr people. (tags: groovy programming) [...]

]]>